available languages: englishFrançais janvier 9, 2018

Désolé, cet article est seulement disponible en Anglais Américain. Pour le confort de l’utilisateur, le contenu est affiché ci-dessous dans une autre langue. Vous pouvez cliquer le lien pour changer de langue active.

While the right to a fair trial is formally established in the Tunisian Constitution, an assessment of proceedings at various courts shows that there is still room for improvement in the implementation of this fundamental right – be it in terms of ordinary laws (under the constitutional levels) or because of insufficient practical arrangements.

Shortcomings include the long duration of legal proceedings (five years on average), some structural weaknesses of the independence of the courts and an infringement of the right to an ‘adversarial trial’, because one party may not have access to all relevant information of a case. Also, the possibility to access to the courts and to legal remedy could be improved.

These are the results of an assessment of proceedings of the Administrative Court, the Competition Council, the Court of Auditors, the Finance Disciplinary Court, and the Constitutional Court, that was conducted by DRI. For a more detailed discussion of this issue, have a look at the newly published briefing paper (French only; Arabic forthcoming):

[Télécharger le rapport sur les contentieux publics et le droit à un procès équitable – FR]

[Télécharger le rapport sur les contentieux publics et le droit à un procès équitable – AR]