available languages: english June 9, 2020

m For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.

The postponement of Sri Lanka’s parliamentary elections, initially scheduled for April 2020, due to the covid-19 pandemic has led to a potential constitutional crisis. In this Briefing Paper, Jagath Liyana Arachchi examines measures that Sri Lanka can take to circumvent a constitutional crisis.

The country’s new president, elected in 2019, dissolved Parliament before the end of its term on 2 March 2020, as Sri Lanka’s constitution allows. While elections were initially set for late April, the Election Commission postponed the vote to an unspecified later date because of the covid-19 pandemic. As a result, Sri Lanka’s parliament has not met for over three months.

Constitutionally the new parliament was required to meet before 2 June 2020, regardless of the vote’s postponement. In addition, the Constitution requires the President to seek Parliamentary approval within 10 days of a declaration of a state of emergency. Neither has occurred, opening the door to a constitutional crisis.

There are three options to avert a potential constitutional crisis: the president revoking the dissolution of the old parliament, the president re-summoning parliament due to an emergency, or referring the question to the supreme court.

Read the Briefing Paper here